Fr. Feeney

FAQ

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hitler greets a cardinal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. Was Fr. Feeney a Racist?

2. Was Fr. Feeney Anti-Semitic?

3. Did Fr. Feeney Support Hatred?

4. Did Fr. Feeney “Deny the Holocaust”?

 

 

1. Was Fr. Feeney a Racist?

 

Fr. Leonard Feeney would probably be considered a racist by most people today, not only because of his beliefs about the Jews – which we shall come to – but with regard to the mixing of the Black and White races in the US. Far from opposing racial segregation in the US, he complained that the Jews were “indiscriminately mixing up black and white families” in housing projects and “creating jungles of crime.”

 

“It was immediately evident to most Jews that there were tremendous advantages in putting lots of Gentile families under one roof and having many such identical roofs congregated in a small area. For those who needed more convincing, the first such assemblages (called by the innocuous name “housing projects”) provided the clincher. Placing the inhabitants in compact, uniform stalls; indiscriminately mixing up black and white families; compelling them to lead a kind of life that strips off the properties and conventions of civilized man — these measures have proven their effectiveness. Housing projects are openly, notoriously, jungles of crime, cruelty, depravity, and vice. As enforcers of Talmudic theology, they are unbeatable.” (Fr. Leonard Feeney, Designs of the Jews on Art and Architecture)

 

The Roman Catholic Church in America historically taught race-mixing is extremely undesirable. [add Glenn quote]

 

 

2. Was Fr. Feeney Anti-Semitic?

 

Fr. Feeney was one of the most famous US anti-Semites of his generation. That is not to say that he had a problem with Semites generally, it was Jews that he was concerned about. He explained his prolonged insistence on “the problem of the Jews” and “their malice” in the penultimate edition of his monthly publication The Point.

 

Point of The Point. Readers of the foregoing reflections may have observed that one topic especially has occupied The Point’s attention during the past seven years: the problem, in its many aspects, of the Jews. Why this emphasis? Because we think it is imperative that American Catholics wake up to the fact that the Jews, as an organized force, are the implacable, declared enemies of Christianity - of its tenets, its traditions, its moral code, its very culture. We think it is vital, too, for American Catholics to realize that the Church has always known this fact about the Jews, and, to the extent of her influence, has counselled and decreed regulations for curbing their malice. And since American Catholic publications, in general, seem determined to say little about these basic matters, we have tried to make up for their negligence by our own insistence.” (Fr. Leonard Feeney, The Point, February 1959)

 

Fr. Feeney also preached against the Jews on Boston Common through the 1950s. He enjoyed calling them “kikes” and stating that he “hates” them. A Catholic journalist Grace Uberti recorded some of his statements, some of which are reproduced in Transcending Boundaries: Boston’s Catholics and Jews, 1929-1965 by Jenny Goldstein.

 

“The Jews have taken over this city.” (14 September 1952)

 

“Every Protestant hates the Jews. Harvard loathes Jews. That is why they got a new President – to keep the Jews away. I don’t hate Jews for the reason he hates them. I hate them because they hate Jesus. They hate Jesus because they are JEWS!” (9 August 1953)

 

“Those kikes are from Hillel House. I warn you of what the Jews are going to do to the Catholic City of Boston.” (31 July 1955)

 

Br. Bernard, was one of the three MICM brothers who spoke publicly with Father Feeney almost every Sunday on Boston Common for seven years, when several thousand listeners were usually in attendance. He recounted in My Recollections of Boston Common how Fr. Feeney’s Saint Benedict Center trained him to speak about the Jews each Sunday, and some of the riots that the Center adherents were involved in with them.

 

“Every Sunday I gave forth on the Jews and what they were up to, and also the traditional Catholic position on the Jewish problem, from Scripture and from history. I also used many of the Jews’ own statements. The Talmudic teachings about Jesus and Mary I often recounted because of my first hand conversations with my Jewish friend Maxwell Lazarus. We were both students at Brookline High School, a 90% Jewish Public High School in Massachusetts from which I graduated. I liked to give lists of the Jewish Communists ruling the countries behind the Iron Curtain in the 1950s. I also kept the crowd up to date with the names of Jewish traitors and spies in our own country. I had memorized the dates on which every country in Europe had expelled the Jews to protect the Church and to return civil order.

 

“Another favorite subject was the final destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in the year 363 under Julian the Apostate. I told how fire came up out of the earth to make rebuilding impossible. I had many quotes from Jewish authors concerning the continuing struggle between Rome and Jerusalem. The Jews proclaimed, ‘Rome must be destroyed before Jerusalem can be the center of a world religion and courts of justice.’

 

“I drew from history to demonstrate the unceasing efforts of the Jews to destroy the Mystical Body of Christ, the Catholic Church.”

 

 

3. Did Fr. Feeney Support Hatred?

 

We have just seen that Fr. Feeney publicly professed his hatred for the Jews on Boston Common. He was quoted in Time Magazine as shouting there, “I preach hatred” (“I Preach Hatred”, Time, October 13, 1952.) The Bible also preaches that hatred is a good thing in appropriate circumstances.

 

 

4. Did Fr. Feeney “Deny the Holocaust”?

 

Fr. Feeney would probably be accused of “denying the Holocaust”. He demonstrated in the April 1956 edition of The Point that it is normal for the Jews to be slaughtered all over the place and he was careful to note that it is but a Jewish “claim” that the Nazis were the “bloodiest” in their regard.

 

“The usual history text which sets out to tell the story of the Jews over the past 2,000 years becomes, in effect, a repetitious catalogue of one mass slaughter after another. For, since the dispersion of the year 70, when more than a million Jews were left dead in the streets of Jerusalem, wholesale death — the riot and then the pogrom — has followed the Jew down each new path of his wanderings.

 

“The total number of Jews put to death under the authority of the later Roman Empire has never been tabulated to the Jews’ satisfaction. In one three-year period (132-135) 500,000 Middle East Jews fell before Roman swords. And each succeeding age, down to our own day, has left a similar record behind it.

 

“The year 523 saw thousands of Jews slaughtered by Christian Abyssinians in Yemen. The Mohammedan Caliph of Damascus took a comparable toll in the early 700’s. The first days of the Crusades brought death to numberless Jewish communities in Central Europe, and when Jerusalem was finally taken by the Christian armies in 1099, the city’s Jewish inhabitants died in the flames of the principal synagogue. The century following saw pogroms in many countries, the most extensive being those of Mohammedan Spain, of France, and of England.

 

“Christian Spain and England both started off the next century with slaughters of the Jews, and Germany concluded it with the pogroms of 1283 and 1298. The year 1321 brought anti-Jewish riots in France, which were surpassed in intensity by those of Spain in 1355. During the fourteenth century, in Germany alone, 300 entire communities of Jews were destroyed. Early in the fifteenth century, all the Jews of Salzburg were burned alive and, shortly after, the riots in Rome provoked by the preaching of Saint John Capistrano forced all the Jews in the city to barricade themselves in their houses.

 

“The most notable Jewish slaughters of the l600’s were those in Poland, where more than 200,000 were slain under the Cossack leader, Chmielnicki. Such treatment for the Jews of Eastern Europe (over half the world’s number at that time) continued into the present century. During Russia’s anti-Jewish demonstrations of 1905, there were 690 separate pogroms within one eleven-day period. And in the years that followed, Greece, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Austria, and Romania all conducted extensive slaughters of their respective Jews — until these countries became incorporated into that potent anti-Jewish machine which the Jews claim was the bloodiest of all time: the National-Socialist Government of Germany.”